GLOCK 17 9mm TORTURE TEST

Warhorse with nearly 300,000 rounds under its belt—and still kicking!

presented by

glock-17-9mm-torture-test
Glock 17 used in author’s ongoing test is a 2nd generation pistol purchased new in 1988.

When the Glock 17 9mm pistol first appeared back in the mid-1980s, I was highly skeptical of its capabilities. To be sure, the advertising claims of its toughness, reliability, user-friendliness and general superiority over other designs were both prolific and vociferous. But let’s face it—all the gun manufacturers make such claims, right?

Aware of its burgeoning popularity, I felt that the professional thing to do was to conduct my own tests to determine not only if Glock’s advertising claims were true, but to also find out the true capabilities of the design. I thus purchased one new from my local dealer and proceeded to wring it out, deciding to try and “shoot it to death,” and keeping copious notes in the process.
One of the first things I decided to do was shoot the pistol without cleaning until it stopped functioning, and simultaneously present it from a holster (I have a daily hour-long dry-practice routine) as much as possible during the process.

This phase took longer than I expected, since the gun continued to function without interruption until a bit over 10,000 rounds had been expended. In fact, it was still functioning, but with a sluggish “ka-chunk” as the slide cycled back and forth. Subsequent examination showed that the fouling had finally reached a point where it interfered with reliable functioning.

During this initial phase, I also wore out several sets of magazines, noting that the follower springs tended to get soft after a month or so if the magazines were left fully loaded with 17 rounds. As a result, after replacing the springs, I decided to experiment a bit, loading them with only 15 rounds instead of the usual 17.

glock-17-9mm-torture-test-b
Trijicon tritium low-light sights installed on the test gun in 1988 finally faded (in 2009) to the point where replacement was required. However, inasmuch as the manufacturer guarantees them for 10 years, the fact that they lasted more than twice that long speaks for itself.

Within a short period of time, it became obvious that the remedy worked. The magazines functioned perfectly even after extended time periods when so loaded. In fact, though they’re the old type that didn’t drop freely from the weapon, I still have four of them and even after thousands and thousands of rounds, and they still work reliably.

As the initial phase ended, I noted that the front sight had holster worn to the point where it was no longer square, making a good sight picture difficult. The corrective process was easy—I replaced it (and the rear sight) with a new set of Trijicon tritium 3-dot sights.


MORE Combat Handguns


 

  • TM

    An interesting perspective:

    If this test were conducted today with ammo prices being roughly $200 per 1K rounds of 9mm FMJ (bulk price), it would cost roughly $60,000. $60,000 through a $450 dollar handgun.

  • Pingback: Glock torture test - Northwest Firearms Community

  • General Jim M

    “I show my Kimber to my friends and my Glock to my enemies” a quote of my friend,Major Mike….. retired US Army. I agree with him.The Glock should be used more widely by the US Armed forces. I prefer the Glock to all other “combat” pistols.The Glock 20 with Doubletap ammunition is a force to be reckoned with. George Patton held the M1 garand in high esteem.I feel the same way about the Glock pistol.It’s pure buisness,not a sissy’s gun.It is for the operator not the dreamer.

  • Jason

    “It is for the operator not the dreamer.”

    Jesus Christ. Just STFU.

  • LtCol.JamesP Mueller

    It’s not that i love the Glock,it’s that i don’t trust the M9 or the 1911. I do trust the M11 but not as much as a Glock.If a Glock jams,it’s usually defective ammo.If the Glock did not feed in an ultra reliable fashion the Glock 18 would not be a machine pistol.

  • Pingback: 4006 Custom

  • PostAmerica

    The name of Jesus should never be used with vulgarity.Jason is obviously a heathen piece of know nothing,doo doo.

  • Pingback: How old, approx how many rounds?

  • Pingback: what is the most durable handgun?

  • Pingback: Fine line between observations and rants sometimes - Gunner Forum

  • borgie

    VERY INTERESTING ARTICLE ABOUT THE G-17 AND IT’S ABILITY TO WITHSTAND ALMOST 300,000 ROUNDS.

    WE ALL KNOW THAT GLOCK HAS BUILT A TOUGH, DURABLE WEAPON THAT WE CAN COUNT ON FOR SAVING OUR LIVES YEAR AFTER YEAR. IT IS AMAZING HOW TOUGH THOSE ‘PLASTIC’ GUNS ARE TODAY.

    SOME NEW GUNS REQUIRE A BREAK-IN PERIOD TO BE DEPENDABLE, BUT I WOULD SAY YOU CAN COUNT ON GLOCK BEING DEPENDABLE FROM THE FIRST DAY YOU TAKE IT HOME.

    I’VE ALWAYS CONSIDERED THE 1911 THE ULTIMATE WEAPON, BUT NOW WITH THE G-22 AND G-23 HOLDING DOUBLE THE AMOUNT OF A 1911, I HARDLY CARRY MY KIMBER ANYMORE.

  • Pingback: Train with service weapon or specific training gun?

  • Pingback: these pistols won the marsoc trials. - Page 2 - INGunOwners

  • Dan

    Ya know Ive been thinking of getting a glock 17 for a while now, but I was wondering if I could find one with an underbarrel picatinny rail?

  • http://www.facebook.com/Il.Cittadino.X Gustavo Gesualdo

    you!

  • Tyler London

    It would be nice of was a complete article rather than just click-bait.