VA Links Mulitple Illnesses to Agent Orange

WASHINGTON, Oct. 13, 2009 – A new Department of Veterans…

WASHINGTON, Oct. 13, 2009 – A new Department of Veterans Affairs ruling will soon relieve Vietnam veterans suffering from three specific illnesses from the burden of proving their ailments are linked to Agent Orange exposure to receive VA health care and disability payments.

Veterans Affairs Secretary Eric K. Shinseki’s decision, announced today, establishes a service connection for Vietnam vets stricken with hairy-cell leukemia and other B-cell leukemias, Parkinson’s disease and ischemic heart disease, VA chief of staff John Gingrich told American Forces Press Service.

Shinseki made the decision based on a recent report by the National Academy of Science’s Institute of Medicine. The report cited new scientific studies pointing to a strong connection between the illnesses and Agent Orange exposure.

Shinseki determined that evidence was compelling enough to establish a presumption that affected veterans’ illnesses are service-related, Gingrich said.

This determination will short-cut the process for them to receive services through what Shinseki called “a world-class health care system,” as well as monthly disability payments.

But before the ruling takes effect, it must be published in the Federal Register and opened for final comment, Gingrich explained. He predicted that the process would be completed early next year.

It’s unclear exactly how many of the 2.1 million Vietnam veterans the ruling will affect, Gingrich said. If 10 percent have the presumed illnesses, that could result in some 200,000 new VA claims.

Agent Orange, named for the orange-colored barrels in which it was stored, was sprayed widely during the Vietnam War to defoliate trees and remove concealment for the enemy. Veterans have long blamed the herbicide for causing a variety of illnesses, but until now, there’s been no official recognition of a link. That put the burden on veterans to prove an association – a process Shinseki conceded too often has created an adversarial relationship between the VA and veterans.

Shinseki, a retired Army general and a Vietnam veteran himself, lamented this situation this summer at
a medical symposium in San Antonio.

“I have asked why, 40 years after Agent Orange was last used in Vietnam, this secretary is still adjudicating claims for presumption of service-connected disabilities tied to its toxic effects,” he told attendees at the Association of the U.S. Army’s Institute of Land Warfare Army Medical Symposium.

Shinseki also questioned why the debilitating effects of Gulf War illnesses still are being debated 20 years after Operation Desert Storm.

“Why weren’t conclusive studies conducted by [the Department of Defense] and VA to render presumption of service-connected disability resulting from exposure to toxic environments associated with these operations?” Shinseki asked. “Such findings would have facilitated VA’s settling of service-connected disability claims in far less time. The scientific method, and the failure to advocate for the veteran, got in the way of our processes.”

Veterans deserve better, he said.

“We must do better reviews of illnesses that may be connected to service, and we will,” he said. “Veterans who endure health problems deserve timely decisions based on solid evidence.”

Shinseki’s decision brings to 15 the number of presumed illnesses VA recognizes. Others are:

— Acute and subacute transient peripheral neuropathy;

— AL amyloidosis;

— Chloracne;

— Chronic lymphocytic leukemia;

— Diabetes Mellitus (Type 2);

— Hodgkin’s disease;

— Multiple myeloma;

— Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma;

— Porphyria cutanea tarda;

— Prostate cancer;

— Respiratory cancers; and

— Soft-tissue sarcoma other than osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, Kaposi’s sarcoma or mesothelioma.

Load Comments
  • Ricky

    I had Prostate cancer at age 50, the surgeon at the VA could not figure out why! The doctor who performed my surgery , spoke off the record and said most likely it was related to Agent Orange.I filed for compensation because the Army finally admitted it was used in Korea in the late 60’s . My claim was thrown out / denied because I could not document coming in contact. Trying to remember all the places and names after 30 years!! How many Korean vets will die or have died without any help! I’m glad one of mu buddies, a Nam vet, finally got help after coming down with Diabetes and now can’t work! when is the government going to step up and accept the blame and open the door for the Korean vets and others who deserve the truth!!!!1

  • Harvey

    The idea that the VA should decide is a conflict of interest, given the policies related to decreasing the budget not to mention that there is a far to high percentage of care takers who have little to no experience with veterans and what their subjected to.
    Speaking of Agent Orange, why are Korean veterans denied disabilities for exposure, are their lives less important? Who makes these decissions and is the criterior based on monitary concerns, afterall 40 some years later after so many have died from agent orange and other toxins now we’re asking why, I don’t get it.
    The VA pats itself on the back and beheads advocates for treatment, while veterans consider the VA their biggest adversary, are they not listening?