From CNN Money with Walter Updegrave:

My husband and I are 48. A couple of years ago he started buying collectible guns for our retirement and has spent over $250,000 on them so far. I totally disagree with his strategy, but would like to know what you think. Is this a good idea? — D.K., Laramie, Wyoming

I’ve heard of a lot of supposedly sure-fire investments for retirement over the years, including parking lots, fish farms, self-storage facilities and tax liens just to name a few. But collectible firearms…that’s a new one to me.

Let me start by saying I have nothing against the idea of your husband or anyone else assembling a collection of antique or vintage handguns, rifles, whatever. There’s a lot of fascinating history behind them.

But as a strategy for investing for retirement, I have to side with you: I think it’s a bad idea for a number of reasons.
First, unless the $250,000 your husband has spent so far is a very, very small part of a much larger retirement kitty — and I mean something along the lines of $5 million or more — his strategy is seriously flawed because it’s not diversified.
Low-risk retirement

Going lock, stock and barrel into any single asset class is never a good idea. Doing so with a niche investment amplifies the risk.

Read the rest of the article at CNN Money.

Up Next

In Australia the bayonet course brings Marines back to basics.

From CNN Money with Walter Updegrave: Question: My husband and I are 48. A…