Comment(s)

Judge Shira A. Scheindlin, ruled that stop-and-frisk episodes, which soared in number over the last decade as crime continued to decline, demonstrated a widespread disregard for the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures by the government, according to the ruling. It also found violations with the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause.

According to the 195-page decision, police officers have for years been systematically stopping innocent people in the street without any objective reason to suspect them of wrongdoing. Officers often frisked these people, usually young minority men, for weapons or searched their pockets for contraband, like drugs, before letting them go.

Read more at NYTimes.com.

Up Next

HERO COP SAVES HATCHLING SEA TURTLES – VIDEO

Judge Shira A. Scheindlin, ruled that stop-and-frisk episodes, which soared in number over the last…